En
+380 show number +38 095 19 19 190
Submit your application

The Supreme Court of Ukraine approved the binding nature of the treaty! Conclusion on case No. 456/2946/17

Initially!

The legal entity filed a lawsuit against the individual in court, demanding the fulfillment of the obligation under the terms of the preliminary tripartite agreement with the transfer of advance payments for the further purchase of the apartment by the defendant.

The claims were motivated by the fact that the applicant fulfilled his obligations regarding information support and assistance in signing between the defendant and a third party of the apartment sale and purchase agreement.

The defendant bought the apartment, but refused to sign the acceptance certificate for the work performed by the plaintiff and refused to pay the commission too. Moreover, to the claim filed by the legal entity in court, she reacted with a counterclaim, demanding recognition of the worthlessness of the contract.

She stated that the agreement did not meet the requirements of the law, namely, Article 635 of the Civil Code of Ukraine. They referred to the fact that the agreement did not contain essential conditions, namely, the functionality of providing assistance and information support was not specified and it was not notarized.

The court of first instance took the side of the legal entity, the appeal took the side of the defendant, and the Supreme Court of Ukraine supported the decision of the court of first instance, simultaneously explaining to the parties the legal aspects of the tripartite agreements.

“The supreme instance concluded that the agreement cannot be considered not concluded after its full or partial fulfillment by the parties, and in this case it will not be an appropriate way of protection to recognize it as concluded!”

In this case, everything is unambiguous!

The plaintiff fulfilled its obligations – provided information support and assistance in the signing by the defendant and a third party of the contract for the purchase and sale of housing, and the defendant did not fulfill it – the plaintiff did not pay for the services of the plaintiff.

This is confirmed by the norms of legislation governing the legal drafting of contracts:

  1. The parties have the right to conclude agreements containing elements of various agreements and the rules of contract law in their respective parts are applied to them, unless otherwise established by this same agreement or law (part 2 of article 628 of the Civil Code).
  2. The controversial agreement is mixed, and in terms of regulating relations between the parties in the case, it is an agreement for the provision of services that the customer had to pay after receiving (part 1 of article 903 of the Civil Code).
  3. In this situation, one of the fundamental principles of civil law “works” – the obligation to treaty, imputing to the parties not only rights, but also obligations (Article 629 of the Civil Code).

The Ukrainian Supreme Court also agreed with the arguments that the disputed agreement is not a preliminary contract for the sale and purchase, since its subject is the provision of services to ensure the conclusion of the sale and purchase in the future after the preparation of all the documentation. The law does not contain a prescription regarding the obligation to notarize such contracts.

22.04.2020

304

YOU MAY BE INTERESTED IN
Ownership of a share in common property: legal subtleties of grounds for termination

We will not dwell on the fact that the right to property is constitutional, therefore inviolable and no one can be deprived or limited in its exercise. The purpose of this publication is to provide information on the nuances of terminating ownership of a share in common property, because this right most often becomes the […]

Can a share in the authorized capital of a legal entity be the object of the division of the property of the spouses?

General rule: “Article 69 of the Civil Code of Ukraine entitles both spouses to the division of property belonging to them under the right of joint co-ownership. At the same time, it does not matter if they are divorced or not!” The same norm clarifies that the property that the spouses “acquired” during the marriage […]

Have you built a house? Putting it into operation correctly!

The authorities continue to make sure that citizens provide themselves with housing! Not so long ago, the Ministry of Regional Development explained the nuances of a simplified procedure for the construction of a residential building, and now a detailed procedure for putting private houses into operation has appeared on the official website. Analyzing the process! […]

How to choose a good lawyer?

Sooner or later, almost everyone may have problems with the law. This can apply to a variety of situations, ranging from the most harmless to quite serious. But in any case, it is important to turn to competent specialists who are well versed in a specific topic and have all the necessary skills and tools […]

Contractual obligations and installment of court decision

The Grand Chamber of the Supreme Court of Ukraine, by its legal opinion in case No. 916/190/18 of 06/04/19, answered the question, does the installment plan for the execution of the judgment terminate the contractual obligation? According to the published conclusion, the installment plan, in fact, only affects the procedure for the enforcement of the […]

Civil marriage: showdown because of the apartment bought in it

Family showdown is an eternal topic! Even the array of family legislation and court practice accumulated over decades does not contain answers to all questions regarding family relations! The Supreme Court once again had to figure out whether or not the testimonies of witnesses certified by a notary are considered legal confirmation of a civil […]